Nicaea and the Church of the East in the period of the Syriac Renaissance
Despite the fact that the Church of the East, after some hesitation, received the Council of Nicea only at the Synod of Seleucia-Ctesiphon in 410 under Catholicos-Patriarch Isaac, the historiographic and theological literature of subsequent periods abounds in references to Nicaea, in many cases related to canonical issues. The so-called period of the Syriac Renaissance (1025–1318) is characterized by frequent contacts between Latin Christianity and the Church of the East, culminating in the sending of an embassy by the Mongol Il-Khan Arghun to Rome and frequent visits by Latin missionaries to the Catholicos and other dignitaries of the Church of the East. In the literature produced during this period, both in Syriac and Arabic, the mentioning of Nicaea seems to function as an effort to establish common ground between East and West. Several authors (for example Elias of Nisibis, considered as the first author of the Syriac Renaissance) try to show that bishops of the Church of the East attended the Council of Nicea or, in the case of the Catholicos Papa, had good reasons not to be there. The priest and theologian Ṣalībā ibn Yuḥannā, compiler of the theological summa Asfār al-asrār (completed in 1332), quotes various references to Nicaea in several texts included into this work, with a long chapter on the reasons for convening this Council, possibly written by himself. An analysis of this chapter from the perspective of Ṣalībā’s views of the Church of the East, and an attempt at establishing the sources or traditions known to him, will be the core of my presentation. His views will be compared to those of `Abdīsho` bar Brīkhā (d. 1318), generally considered as the last great author of the Syriac Renaissance.