Fellowship and the Council of Nicaea
The Great Commission given to the disciples at the time of Jesus’ Ascension and the Pentecost Day that followed ten days later made it clear that Christ’s Church was to encompass people from all nations and that the widespread groups of believers were meant to see themselves as part of one universal Church. This unity or koinonia could only be accomplished through regular communication between geographically, linguistically, and ethnically disparate groups and through brotherly negotiation of customs and viewpoints. The circulation of letters between congregations and the meetings of church leaders (councils or synods) were two of the main methods by which this koinonia was achieved. While local and regional meetings were increasingly common in the first three centuries, larger gatherings were hindered by difficulties of travel and lack of recognition by the government. When Constantine finally consolidated control over the entire Roman Empire in 324, the Church and its leaders not only found a secure place in society but were also enabled to freely gather in councils. By that time, however, numerous schisms and heresies had divided the Church and forced it to officially bar some clergy from taking part in the liturgical, sacramental, and administrative acts of koinonia. Constantine himself saw the “general” council of 325 to be held at Nicaea as an opportunity for Christians from across the Roman oikomene—and even for some outside its northern and eastern borders—to meet and function as the one, holy, ecclesia of God. Having provided background on the biblical doctrine of fellowship and how it was practiced in the first three centuries, this paper will examine how it was put into practice by the participants at Nicaea and how this subsequently became a model for the worldwide Church. The gathering of Christian leaders from widespread geographical areas, the vigorous debate over doctrinal discussions, the excommunication of those who differed in their teaching, the stress on a public adherence to approved teaching yet allowing dissidents to repent and be welcomed back, the united public worship and celebration of the sacraments, the concern over commonality in ritual and calendar, the leniancy shown to schismatics who wished to reunite with the Church, the decisions regarding regional administration and other clergy guidelines, the approval of canons, the subscribing to a creed—all these were among the methods that a biblical koinonia around the “rule of faith” was fostered at the council and in the following centuries. A re-examination of the council’s actions will then be used in evaluating the breakdown of some of these practices in recent times.